Anal & oral sex between consenting heterosexual adults is permissible by law but not between consenting homosexual adults. That's stupid. A man demeans the existence of a woman by f**king her ass rather than f**king her pussy. Imagine a husband saying this to his wife: "can I f*** your ass tonight?" The wife would be thinking "wtf?! I got a pussy for u to scr** but yet you want to f*** my ass?!" If the homophobes argument in this issue is tt anal sex is against what is intended by God because He made Adam & Eve, man & woman, & His intention for them to be together is to be "fruitful & multiply" & populate the Earth & the anus was designed by Him for defecation.
To quote the anti-gay Dr Thio Li-Ann herself: "Anal-penetrative sex is inherently damaging to the body and a misuse of organs, like shoving a straw up your nose to drink. The anus is designed to expel waste". Yet, heterosexual anal sex between consenting adults is decriminalised. Hypocrites!
Homophobes are contradicting themselves when anal sex between heterosexual adults is decriminalised. Why the biasness? Isn't heterosexual anal sex also carnage act against the order of nature? Did God also designed a woman's ass for sex in addition of defecation? Is heterosexual anal sex a natural act? Animals may perform autofellation (as seen in male dogs) & homosexual acts (as seen in freemartins) but they are wise enough not to perform anal sex among themselves (because feces has a plethora of microorganisms, some may cause urinary tract infection [UTI] in the penetrating male). While the rist of UTI in the penetrating male is reduced by cleaning the bowel by douching with enema prior sex, the point is: anal sex is an unnatural act that is not sanctioned by God, whether it's homosexual nor heterosexual.
Dr Thio was also quoted as saying this: "when something is forcibly inserted into it (the anus), the (anal sphincter) muscles contract and cause tearing". That usually happens during forced anal penetration during anal rape. Due to the involuntary nature of the inner anal sphincter, penetration has to be done gently & with care, so as not to tear the anal muscles there, which may result in loss of muscle tone & fecal incontinence. Nevertheless, fecal incontinence may occur to gay bottoms who are penetrated very regularly for very long time, & especially by very thick penises.
Anal cancer is often caused by the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), the same virus that causes cervical & more rarely oral & penile carcinomas is a threat to both homosexuals & heterosexuals alike, especially those who have multiple raw partners.
The same goes for oral sex. The mouth is designed by God as part of the digestive tract & as an orifice for the entry & mastication of food, not to be a receptable for the male penis. Therefore, oral sex is also unnatural & against the order of nature & God's divine intention. Furthermore, heterosexual oral sex may contribute to reduced fertility because the female who ingested semen may develop antibodies against the man's spermatozytes. This is because of the presence of M cells in the human small intestine, which samples antigens in the gut lumen & present these antigens to other immune cells, which result in the development of antibodies against these antigens. Therefore, oral sex among heterosexual couples should be banned because it reduces fertility. As for homosexual couples, because their sexual unions do not result in procreation, oral sex should not be banned on consenting homosexual adults.
Besides these, Section 377 does not criminalise wife rape. Rape can be defined as unconsented entry of a man's penis into a woman's vagina, whether that ultimately results in male ejaculation or not into the vagina. If the husband argues that the woman's body is no longer hers but his, the same should apply to the husband, that his body is no longer his but hers for her sexual pleasure. Therefore, it is a husband's duty to fulfil his wife's sexual demands, no matter how voracious her sexual appetite is. Furthermore, he must be able to keep his penis hard & firm at the 4th level of erection (1st level: tofu, 2nd fully ripe banana, 3rd: unripe banana, 4th zucinni) from the start & end of the sex session & she is to be able to attain orgasm in each episode of sexual penetration by her husband. Furthermore, he is to f*** her till she is satisfied & that is not a 5 minute f***. Impossible right? How many females ever achieved orgasm from sex with their male partner? How frequent? How many males are able to hold their erection at the 4th level to keep their sex partner satisfied?
What about males who claimed to be straight but enjoy inserting objects up their asses? Sometimes, the object got lost in the rectum beyond the sigmoid colon, which necessitates immediate medical attention. The doctors in the hospitals' A&E can testify that they encounter this pretty often. Are these ass-players suffering from a mental illness? Aren't these acts against the order of nature, since the direction of movement of things in the anus is OUT, not in. Neither is it "in & out"! Shouldn't these males be prosecuted?
What about adultery & fornification (pre-marital sex)? Should these offenders not be punished? In countries like Taiwan, they have outlawed adultery but permited homosexual anal sex between consenting adults. Is it not time that Singaporeans be more opened minded? If they can be open minded about anal & oral sex between consenting heterosexual adults, if they can overlook adultery & fornification & gross overexpression of love & sexual freedom in public by heterosexual couples, surely they can overlook homosexual sex between consenting gay adult men.
No comments:
Post a Comment